:: ::

:: MAX BLACK ::

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." --C.S. Lewis
"The Swiss pocket knife of conservative thought on the web..." - Eli Kardrakian
"Bookmark Max and dump your subscription to the newspaper; if you don't have a birdcage you really don't need it anyway..." - Shirley St. James

:: Welcome to Prairie Fire --Max's Blog Aggregator :: Bloghome | ::
[::..Time for News..::]
[::..Search..::]
:: Google [>]
:: LexisNexis AC [>]
:: Whois [>]
:: Intelius [>]
[::..Breaking News..::]
:: Drudge [>]
:: Fox News [>]
:: CNN [>]
::.Right Talk Radio.::
::.Watch CSPAN Live.::
::.Watch BBC Live.::
[::..Max Recommends..::]
:: Law of the Blogger[>]
:: What's This? [>]
:: Brussels Journal [>]
:: The Dissident Frogman [>]
:: Daily Gut [>]
:: Babalu Blog [>]
:: eWEEK [>]
[::..Power Punditry..::]
:: News Busters [>]
:: V.D. Hanson [>]
:: ThreatsWatch [>]
:: WSJ Opinion Journal [>]
:: Real Clear Politics [>]
:: National Review [>]
:: Townhall [>]
:: Michael Barone [>]
:: Michael Yon [>]
[::..MasterBloggers..::]
:: Instapundit [>]
:: LGF [>]
:: Michelle Malkin [>]
:: Hot Air [>]
:: No Pasaran [>]
:: Tim Blair (New) [>]
:: Tim Blair (Old) [>]
:: Kate McMillan [>]
:: protein wisdom [>]
:: Donald Luskin [>]
:: JustOneMinute [>]
:: Roger L. Simon [>]
:: The Corner [>]
:: Powerline [>]
:: American Thinker [>]
:: Davids Medienkritik [>]
:: Jeff Jarvis [>]
:: Michael J. Totten [>]
:: Iraq The Model [>]
:: Hugh Hewitt [>]
:: Belmont Club [>]
:: Austin Bay [>]
:: Gates of Vienna [>]
:: Cap's Corner [>]
:: Lucianne Goldberg [>]
:: Lou Minatti [>]
:: Ann Coulter [>]
:: Atlas Shrugs [>]
:: RedState [>]
:: Belgravia Dispatch [>]
:: Samizdata [>]
:: QandO [>]
:: Chicago Boyz [>]
:: Gateway Pundit [>]
:: INDC [>]
:: PoliPundit [>]
:: Natalie Solent [>]
:: Oxblog [>]
:: Daniel Drezner [>]
:: Clive Davis [>]
:: Brian Maloney [>]
:: Armavirumque [>]
:: SondraK [>]
:: Iowa Hawk [>]
:: Photon Courier [>]
:: Althouse [>]
:: Betsy's Page [>]
:: James Lileks [>]
:: Ed Driscoll [>]
:: FloridaCracker [>]
:: David Schraub [>]
:: Joe Gandelman [>]
:: Wonkette [>]
:: Virginia Postrel [>]
:: Den Beste [>]
:: LaShawnBarber [>]
:: ShotintheDark [>]
:: Pejmanesque [>]
:: Winds of Change [>]
:: American Digest [>]
:: Wizbang! [>]
:: Dean's World [>]
[::.World.::]
:: Publius Pundit [>]
:: Peaktalk [>]
:: UNSCAM Central [>]
:: E-nough! [>]
:: EU Referendum [>]
:: babalu blog [>]
:: EuroPundits [>]
:: Eursoc [>]
:: EurasiaNet [>]
:: Observing Hermann [>]
:: Biased BBC [>]
:: Natalie Solent [>]
:: Whacking Day Au [>]
:: Thomas Kohl [>]
:: Adam Smith Ins [>]
:: Slugger O'Toole [>]
:: Iberian Notes [>]
:: Barcepundit [>]
:: Scraps of Moscow [>]
[::..Think Tanks..::]
:: Claremont Ins [>]
:: Hoover Institute [>]
:: Cato Institute [>]
:: AEI [>]
:: Hudson Institute [>]
:: EFF [>]
[::..Marketplace..::]
:: TradeSports [>]
:: PredictionMarkets [>]
:: The IEM [>]
:: InflationCalculator [>]
:: FundAlarm [>]
:: DowJones [>]
:: Mutual Funds [>]
[::..Arms..::]
:: Arms and Law [>]
:: The Arms Site [>]
:: Kim du Toit [>]
:: Gun Tests [>]
:: Alphecca [>]
:: Pink Pistols [>]
[::..Weather..::]
:: NDFD XML [>]
:: Kansas City [>]
:: New York [>]
:: Los Angeles [>]
:: Chicago [>]
:: Denver [>]
:: Miami [>]
[::..Middle East..::]
:: Amarji-Syria [>]
:: Free Iran! [>]
:: Messopotamian [>]
:: IraqiBlogCentral [>]
:: Big Pharaoh [>]
:: View from Iran [>]
:: Iran Briefing [>]
:: Austin Bay [>]
:: Muslim Refusenik [>]
[::..Mil-Blogs..::]
:: Blogs of War [>]
:: BlackFive [>]
:: MudvilleGazette [>]
:: MarineCorpsMoms [>]
:: Strategy Page [>]
:: Iraq Now [>]
:: Command Post [>]
[::..Education..::]
:: Fire's Torch [>]
:: Joanne Jacobs [>]
[::..Media-Culture..::]
:: Teachout [>]
:: MediaBlog [New!] [>]
:: Romenesko [>]
:: MRC [>]
:: Media Drop [>]
:: Alice Marshall [>]
:: Doc Searls [>]
:: ThatLiberalMedia [>]
:: TimesWatch [>]
:: RatherBiased [>]
:: Cathy's World [>]
:: Jessica Duchen [>]
:: IWF Inkwell [>]
:: iSteve [>]
:: BoingBoing [>]
:: A Small Victory [>]
:: IMAO [>]
[::.Automobile.::]
:: Autoblog [>]
:: Cars Direct [>]
:: Edmunds [>]
[::.Fashion.::]
:: ManoloForHim [>]
:: ManoloForHer [>]
:: ManoloBlog [>]
[::..Law..::]
:: Volokh Conspiracy [>]
:: Instalawyer [>]
:: BeldarBlog [>]
:: FIRE [>]
:: LawMeme [>]
:: DogLaw News [>]
:: Business Law & Reg [>]
[::..Medicine..::]
:: Dr. Charles [>]
:: Code Blue [>]
:: WellTimedPeriod [>]
:: MedPundit [>]
:: MedicalRants [>]
:: Symtym [>]
:: GruntDoc [>]
:: Capsules [>]
:: MedGadget [>]
:: Shrinkette [>]
[::..Government..::]
:: Open Secrets [>]
:: Thomas [>]
:: CIA Factbook [>]
:: DoD [>]
:: Whitehouse [>]
:: Senate [>]
:: Congress [>]
:: NIMA.mil [>]
:: New Sisyphus [>]
[::..Security..::]
:: Counterterror [>]
:: Defensetech [>]
:: DEBKAfile [>]
:: Global Guerrillas [>]
:: IAGS [>]
[::..SciTech..::]
:: Slashdot [>]
:: Corante [>]
:: Edge [>]
:: Engadget [>]
:: Gizmodo [>]
:: Wired [>]
:: Tech Central [>]
:: SciTech Daily [>]
:: SPACE.com [>]
:: Science Blog [>]
:: Heavens Above [>]
:: Astropic [>]
[::..Computer..::]
:: CastleCops [>]
:: Think Secret [>]
:: Lifehacker [>]
[::..Left Blogs..::]
:: Dem Underground [>]
:: Jerry Brown [>]
[::..Humor..::]
:: Dem Underground [>]
:: ScrappleFace [>]
:: Caption This [>]
:: Dave Barry [>]
:: Day by Day [>]
:: Cox/Forkum [>]
[::..NutzNboltz..::]
:: Popdex [>]
:: Technorati [>]
:: Listed on Blogwise
:: TTLB Ecosystem Details
[::..archive..::]
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
Listed on BlogShares

:: Monday, November 28, 2005 ::

Maxatorial

Is Google manipulating search results?

Because the Internet has enabled everyone - and I mean everyone on this planet - a real voice in public policy, the dictatorial ruling classes around the globe are feeling the heat. This is why the UN would love to get their bloody, conniving hands on the Internet - the free flow of information threatens their private little kleptocracy-club. Of course, selective editing or filtering of the content of the Internet by certain countries, like China and Saudi Arabia, has been going on for some time but that's a far cry from allowing centralized control of the root servers at the heart of the internet by an entity as demonstrably incapable, corrupt and buffoonish as the UN.

More surprising, the unabashedly liberal founders of Google have been accused of altering search rankings, and deleting content that doesn't necessarily fit their particular philosophical viewpoint - a far more dangerous precedent because this simple work-around proves control of the Internet's root servers isn't required for the control of the flow of information! Should someone wish to prevent the unwashed masses from accessing information deemed politically incorrect a simple tweak of Google's ranking algorythms can render entire genres of infomation invisible with the click of a mouse.

In fact, Google admits removing controversial content such as racial hate sites and although somewhat arbitrary [there are currently 3,640,000 kiddie-porn sites listed on Google!] this type of "editing" seems reasonable. But what is disturbing here is that because Google is a corporate entity it isn't compelled to provide an explanation of their criteria for deleting websites from its database [or relegating "offending" sites into search-engine purgatory] and have been less than forthcoming in stating publicly what sites have been redacted and why. As an example, researchers found that a sample query on Google-USA differed significantly from the same query on Google-France and Germany. When confronted with the finding, Google spokesman Nate Tyler said: "each site was removed only after a specific complaint from the government of the country concerned."

Oh really? What other "specific complaints" have governments registered with Google? Nobody knows.

As the depth and reach of the Internet increases over time, those who have reason to fear it's extraordinary capabilities will likely exert pressure to gain editorial control - particularly in times of political unrest. Of course, this is the very point when it's power is most useful to the people and conversely, most threatening to the political elite. What mechanism prevents Google from caving to the whims of powerful but corrupt governments in the future?

At this juncture, it does not appear Google is meddling with content in any wholesale fashion but it does look as though they're tinkering. As a publicly traded company, they owe the general public and their shareholders a policy paper stating explicitly what sites they are blocking and why. This statement should also include a transparent, honest, timely and public release of all requests by governments and government officials to censor sites the country in question is urging Google to block. As it stands now, nobody has a clue how much "filtering" the most popular search-engine in the world is doing.

An internet without Google is now impossible to imagine - it's so effective and useful it's become an essential feature - an extension really - of human cognition. As the web matures and nodes are added, the search component can only gain in power. It's hard to imagine how it might evolve in, say, a decade. If Google should ultimately edge out all contenders in the search-engine wars and become the default tool for the retrieval and dissemination of news and information - the singular and solitary source of access to the world's collective intelligence - it's keepers must leave their political ideology and financial conflicts of interest behind and develop and implement demonstrable safeguards that insure it's future integrity.

Related: CNET article announcing the awarding of patents pertaining to Google's search technologies.

More: Did you know Google maintains a Blog? Yes, it's a GoogleBlog and I can't believe I just wrote that.

More: Everybody loves Google Maps; this person is obsessed with them.

More: Here's the unofficial Google Weblog and Xooglers, a web log maintained by Google's former marketing director [a fascinating chronicle of the heady startup days when Google was little more than an idea].

More: Googling Google: 745 MILLION hits in under 1/3 of a second [astonishing].

:: Max 3:07 PM [+] ::
...

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?